office license perpetual vs subscription

It’ll be available as a commercial preview in April and will be available on both Mac and Windows, in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions.Īnd like with the previous version, it’s clear that Microsoft would really prefer if you just moved to the cloud already.

Today, Microsoft is announcing what is now called the Microsoft Office LTSC (Long Term Servicing Channel). A while back, it launched Office 2019, which includes the standard suite of Office tools, but is frozen in time and without the benefit of the regular feature updates and cloud-based tools that come with the subscription offering. But as the company promised, it will continue to make a standalone, perpetual license for Office available for the foreseeable future. Your licence determines the features you can see and use.If you use Office, Microsoft would really, really, really like you to buy a cloud-enabled subscription to Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365). There is only one actual version, one set of code. Isn't Lr6 already a subset of Lr CC? There are features in CC that aren't in the perpetual version.

I guess they just keep the trial option as a nudge to get people to finally plonk down the money. Thing is Adobe has to pay continuing subscription-like costs for develop features, like reverse engineering all those RAW formats, and paying license fees for Google maps (BTW, be nice if we could customize with different map options). Namely Lr without the Develop and Map modules (Quick Develop still works though).įor the subscription-phobic they'd have a tool they could use for free, which I'm sure they'd like, and then pay for developing via another RAW perpetual-license product. If I were them I'd just have a Lr Lite: which would be what you can use for free now anyway, long after the trial period. I bet the perpetual will eventually go away, but who knows?

Office license perpetual vs subscription